Security Pacific National Bank v. Marder & Marder

Good Law
183 Cal. App. 3d 707·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1837·228 Cal. Rptr. 402
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 1986No. B009310California2,401 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lillie, J.

Objector Marder & Marder appeals from an order to pay to Security Pacific National Bank the sum of $800 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2037.6.

Facts

Marder & Marder, attorneys at law, and Francesca Wagoner, both distributees of the estate of Don E. Marón, deceased, filed objections to account of, and motion to surcharge Security Pacific National Bank (hereinafter Bank) as administrator of the estate, for negligently managing and selling real property in the estate. Trial was set for November 29, 1983. Bank timely sent to objectors a demand to exchange lists of expert witnesses on September 20, 1983, with a date of exchange set for October 10, 1983. Objectors mistakenly believed their list of experts had been timely sent to Bank’s attorneys, and only discovered Bank had not received their list on November 18, 1983. On November 21, 1983, objectors sent their list of experts to Bank and filed a motion to allow objectors to present testimony of designated expert witnesses. Bank filed opposition to the motion arguing it would be prejudiced if objectors’ witnesses were allowed to testify because Bank had prepared its case in large part in reliance on the fact…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.