Division of Occupational Safety & Health v. State Board of Control

Good Law
189 Cal. App. 3d 794·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1410·234 Cal. Rptr. 661·1987 CCH OSHD 27,921
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1987No. C000006California4,792 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Puglia, J.

—In this appeal we consider whether a safety regulation promulgated by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Division) of the Department of Industrial Relations mandates increased costs to local *798 government such that they are reimbursable under the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code section 2201 et seq. 1 With respect to the period of time in issue, we conclude that the regulation does not create reimbursable state-mandated costs.

On October 8, 1980, Arcade Fire District (Arcade) filed a test claim with the State Board of Control (Board) asserting that title 8, section 5144, subdivision (g), of the California Administrative Code (hereafter referred to as Regulation) imposed additional manpower requirements upon it and other local fire protection districts beyond service levels required prior to January 1, 1973. 2 A local governmental agency (§ 2211), Arcade sought state reimbursement under former section 2231. (Repealed Stats. 1986, ch. 879, § 23; see now Gov. Code, § 17561.) Arcade claimed it incurred additional manpower costs during fiscal years 1978-1979 and 1979-1980 as a result of Regulation 5144, subdivision (g), and that these costs were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.