Wetzel

Wetzel v. Mallette

Good Law
198 Cal. App. 3d 728·1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 108·243 Cal. Rptr. 832
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1988D006094California4,883 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Todd, J.

Kaylyn Mallette appeals an order confirming the sale of residential real property upon the petition of George C. Wetzel, executor of the estate of Mallette’s deceased mother, Evelyn B. Barthelmess. 1 Mallette seeks to overturn the sale to third party purchasers and to have the residence distributed to herself and her two brothers in kind as tenants in common under the basic distribution provision in Barthelmess’s will giving the estate to the three children share and share alike.

Mallette challenges the order confirming the sale on the grounds (1) Probate Code 2 section 582 prohibits a sale after expiration of the period to file claims where the sale is not required to pay debts as was the case here, (2) the evidence does not support the allegations of the petition or the court’s finding the sale was for the best interest of the estate, (3) the court abused its discretion by confirming the sale after Mallette overbid the purchaser in the required amounts at the confirmation hearing, and (4) the part of the confirmation order directing that escrow may close 30 days from the date of the order is contrary to law and constitutes reversible error.

Finding no merit in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.