Hallmark Insurance v. Superior Court

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 497·201 Cal. App. 3d 1014·247 Cal. Rptr. 638
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 1988No. B033221California1,776 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Klein, J.

Hallmark Insurance Company, is petitioning for an order reversing the denial of its motion for summary judgment in a bad faith insurance action, contending the Hallmark policy in conspicuous and clear language unambiguously limits coverage to injuries occurring within the policy period. We agree and grant the writ.

Discussion

Hallmark issued a general liability policy to Delta Wing Kites and Gliders, Inc. (hereafter Delta), which corporation manufactured hang gliders. On June 18, 1978, Richard Wohlgemuth was killed while using a Delta hang glider. Wohlgemuth’s hang glider was manufactured in July 1974, within the time period covered by the policy. However, the policy was discontinued in March 1975, over three years before the accident which caused Wohlgemuth’s death.

When Wohlgemuth’s heirs filed a wrongful death action against Delta, Hallmark refused to defend or indemnify Delta. After Wohlgemuth’s heirs received a $1.75 million judgment against Delta, both the heirs and Delta filed this bad faith insurance action against Hallmark.

*1017 In denying the motion for summary judgment, the respondent court found “The Hallmark policy is ambiguous and does not present…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.