Acuna

People v. Acuna

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 852·204 Cal. App. 3d 602·251 Cal. Rptr. 387
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 1988No. D006192California3,344 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Work, J.

Luis Martinez Acuna appeals a judgment convicting him of unlawfully driving and taking a motor vehicle not his own, without the consent of the owner and with the intent to deprive the owner of its possession. (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a).) He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss because potentially material defense witnesses were released and deported by law enforcement officers pretrial in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights to compulsory process for obtaining witnesses and the assistance of counsel and his Fifth Amendment right to due process. We are satisfied Acuna had no Sixth Amendment right to consult with counsel before choosing whether to agree to the pretrial release of witnesses. Assuming, but not granting, Acuna was entitled to the assistance of counsel before this decision under independent state constitutional grounds, the record shows he knowingly and intelligently waived that *606 assistance and elected to release the witnesses. Accordingly, we hold the trial court properly denied his dismissal motion and affirm the judgment.

I

Factual and Procedural Background

United States border patrolmen stopped and arrested Acuna…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.