City of Westminster v. County of Orange

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 855·204 Cal. App. 3d 623·251 Cal. Rptr. 511
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 1988No. G006360California3,873 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Crosby, J.

*626 Opinion

In a superior court action for injunctive and declaratory relief, the City of Westminster unsuccessfully challenged the constitutionality of Proposition 62, a statewide statutory initiative passed in November 1986. The initiative will nullify the city’s recently enacted utility users’ tax unless the municipal electorate approves the levy by November 5, 1988. We believe the requirement of local voter ratification violates the California Constitution and reverse with directions accordingly.

I

The City of Westminster is a general law city. It has encountered increasing fiscal difficulty in recent years, partially as a result of Proposition 13, an earlier statewide initiative, and the abatement of federal revenue sharing. On September 23, 1986, the Westminster City Council enacted a 5 percent utility users’ tax and designated the revenues for the city’s general fund. The tax became effective January 1, 1987, and continues in force.

California voters approved Proposition 62, a statutory initiative, in the November 1986 general election. Sponsored by the California Tax Reduction Movement (CTRM), the initiative added sections 53720 through 53730 to the Government Code.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.