Gerard

Gerard v. Ross

Bad Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 887·204 Cal. App. 3d 968·251 Cal. Rptr. 604
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 1988No. B003449California7,282 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Goertzen, J.

This appeal has been preceded by a trial for libel, consolidating two complaints; a trial for malicious prosecution; an appeal, resulting in an August 21, 1978, opinion by Ashby, J., Hastings, J., and Kaus, J.; and a second trial for malicious prosecution. All parties appeal from the judgment.

Underlying Facts

George Gerard (Gerard) has been a resident of Inglewood since 1962. In 1968, he became interested in local politics; his involvement increased in July 1969, when Inglewood formed a redevelopment agency and his friend, the planning director, was fired. At that time he formed the Inglewood Citizens Committee to raise funds for his fired friend. As a self-described *974 “clean government nut,” Gerard kept close watch on the Inglewood City Council, of which David C. Pierson (Pierson) was a member. 1 He attended numerous city council meetings, speaking vigorously on a wide variety of issues. In addition to complaining to the district attorney’s office about the handling of a zoning matter, Gerard also filed several suits against the city, challenging the validity of various council actions.

In February 1970, Gerard actively campaigned against the election of Pierson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.