Community Development Commission v. City of Fort Bragg

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 900·204 Cal. App. 3d 1124·251 Cal. Rptr. 709
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 1988No. A037754California2,660 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Merrill, J.

Community Development Commission of Mendocino County (CDC) appeals from a judgment denying issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directing the City of Fort Bragg (Fort Bragg) to reinstate a conditional use permit which it found to have expired or to set aside its finding that the permit had expired. The judgment also denied declaratory relief to the effect that a City of Fort Bragg Municipal Ordinance is unconstitutional.

At issue in this appeal is the interpretation of Fort Bragg’s Municipal Code section 18.76.100 which provides for the expiration of conditional use permits in one year of the date of issuance “unless substantial evidence of use is in progress.” We hold the trial court erroneously interpreted this statute as requiring actual on-site construction. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment.

I

On October 26, 1982, CDC, a public housing agency, and Fort Bragg entered into an agreement requiring both parties to cooperate in the development of affordable housing; CDC agreed to obtain federal funding for the project and Fort Bragg agreed to facilitate construction by granting variances where reasonable and necessary. Thereafter, CDC transferred a preexisting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.