Hawley

Hawley v. McSweeney

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 1179·206 Cal. App. 3d 924·255 Cal. Rptr. 430
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1988No. B036079California2,748 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hansonthaxton, J.

Facts

On March 3, 1988, Petitioner Mary Hawley filed a petition in Los Angeles County Superior Court for determination of entitlement to trust proper *926 ty, for imposition of constructive trust, and for instructions, pursuant to Probate Code section 17200.

The petition alleged the existence of a contract agreement between Hawley and her uncle, Kieram Emmet Mullins, regarding the disposition of his estate after his death and after the death of his wife, May Barrett Mullins. The petition alleged that May and Kieram Mullins, who had no children, frequently told petitioner they intended to leave their half interests in their community property to their respective nieces and nephews after the death of their survivor. In 1983, in failing health, Kieram wished May’s assistance in handling his financial affairs. Kieram and May sought the advice of an attorney, John Caldecott, who suggested that Kieram convey title of their community property home to May to allow her to manage their main assets.

Petitioner was present during a meeting during which Kieram and May discussed the transfers with Caldecott and agreed that notwithstanding Kieram’s transfers of community property to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.