Kings County Department of Social Services v. Ginger B.

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 47·207 Cal. App. 3d 504·254 Cal. Rptr. 883
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1989No. F009501California1,248 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hamlin, J.

Both the mother, Ginger B. (Ginger), and the father, William B. (William), of Jessica B., a minor previously declared a dependent *508 child of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) and (d), appeal from an order filed November 12, 1987, on a six-month review hearing. In particular, Ginger and William (jointly referred to as appellants) challenge that part of the court’s order that denied William the right to be in the same home with Ginger and Jessica except under visitation supervised by the Kings County Department of Social Services (the Department). This denial was contrary to the reunification plan recommended by the Department.

Appellants advance multiple grounds for reversal, including the lack of: (1) the required jurisdictional findings; (2) independent and effective counsel for the minor; and (3) any credible evidence upon which to deny reunification. For reasons we will explain, we conclude that none of appellants’ contentions require reversal and affirm the order on review.

The Facts and Procedures in the Juvenile Court

During the afternoon of December 5, 1986, William was caring for his eight-month-old…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.