Avina

Avina v. Cigna Healthplans

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 536·211 Cal. App. 3d 1·259 Cal. Rptr. 105
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 1989No. B035487California666 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gates, J.

In the instant appeal, defendants Cigna Healthplans of California, Cigna Hospital of Los Angeles, Dr. Charles Hunter, and Dr. Edward King challenge the orders of the trial court denying their petition to compel arbitration and their motion for reconsideration. The latter order resulted in an imposition of sanctions in the amount of $750 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5.

The determinative facts are not disputed. Antonio Avina enrolled himself and his six dependents, including his wife Esmeralda, the respondent herein, in a group prepaid health plan requiring binding arbitration. 1 Although *3 he thereafter requested through his employer that he and his family be enrolled in another plan effective September 1, 1985, respondent continued to receive medical care and treatment, including exploratory surgery for which she was hospitalized five days, at Cigna facilities until March 1986. On each occasion, she represented herself to be a member in good standing of Cigna by presenting her group membership card.

On January 23, 1987, respondent filed suit against appellants for medical malpractice, battery, fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.