Shaw

Shaw v. Mcmahon

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 411·219 Cal. App. 3d 973·268 Cal. Rptr. 535
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 23, 1990No. A045237California3,492 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Anderson, J.

The appeal herein constitutes a sequel to this court’s previous decision (Shaw v. McMahon (1987) 197 Cal.App.3d 417 [ 243 Cal.Rptr. 26 ]) and raises an additional issue concerning entitlement to state-only AFDC (aid to families with dependent children) benefits.

I. Factual Background

A. The AFDC Program

The AFDC program was established in 1935 for the purpose of providing benefits to families whose children were needy because of the death, absence or incapacity of a parent. ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 601 , 606(a); Batterton v. Francis (1977) 432 U.S. 416, 418-420 [ 53 L.Ed.2d 448, 452-453 , 97 S.Ct. 2399 ].) This program which is known in California as AFDC-Family Group *976 (AFDC-FG) provides aid only for single-parent families or families where one of the parents is incapacitated. In 1961, Congress adopted a supplemental program to allow states to provide benefits for two-parent families in which the children became needy due to the unemployment of the parents. The latter program is called AFDC-Unemployed Parent (AFDC-U). ( 42 U.S.C. § 607 ; 45 C.F.R. § 233.100 ; Califano v. Westcott (1979) 443 U.S. 76, 79-80 [ 61 L.Ed.2d 382, 387 , 99 S.Ct. 2655 ].)

California enacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.