Medrano

Medrano v. Hohenshelt

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 442·219 Cal. App. 3d 1598·269 Cal. Rptr. 68
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 4, 1990No. H005313California2,158 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cottle, J.

Plaintiff Diana Medrano, administratrix of the estate of Phillip Gonzalez, appeals from a judgment entered after the court granted the motion of defendant, James Hohenshelt, doing business as JMK Enter *1600 prises (JMK) for summary judgment. 1 The court determined that the lease agreement which JMK entered into with defendant Christopher Allen was a conditional sales agreement and that consequently JMK was not liable for any negligence on the part of Allen, driver of the leased vehicle. For reasons we shall explain, we conclude that the document was not a conditional sales agreement and, accordingly, we shall reverse the judgment.

Facts

This action arises out of a traffic accident which occurred on June 28, 1985, at the intersection of Winchester Boulevard and San Tomas Expressway in the county of Santa Clara. Defendant Christopher Allen, who was driving a 1984 Jeep, rear ended a car driven by 70-year-old Phillip Gonzalez and then fled from the scene. Allen was later arrested and booked on charges of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (a)) 2 and fleeing the scene (§ 20001). Gonzalez was admitted to Good Samaritan Hospital,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.