Winston

Winston v. Gibbs

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 666·221 Cal. App. 3d 599·270 Cal. Rptr. 560
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 1990No. A045376California3,360 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Poché, J.

The law of California allows a will to be refused admission to probate if it is the product of undue influence exercised by a *603 beneficiary under the will. A person contesting a will on this ground is aided by a presumption of undue influence if the contestant produces evidence that the beneficiary (1) had a confidential relationship with the decedent (2) was active in procuring the will and (3) “unduly” profited from it. The issue presented on this appeal by a losing contestant is whether the probate court erred in not instructing the jury that the concept of undue profit has a purely quantitative definition. In light of its radical departure from existing precedent and practices governing will contests, we reject this contention and aflirm.

Background

Decedent Guillermo Sarabia (also known as William Winston) was a professional opera singer who spent almost all of his adult life living and working in Europe. Beginning in 1978 decedent lived first in Germany and then in the Netherlands with Leonard C. Gibbs, who acted as the paid manager/agent for most of decedent’s financial affairs and took care of running their household. Decedent died of a heart attack in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.