Mason v. Lawyers Surety Corp.

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1094·224 Cal. App. 3d 634·274 Cal. Rptr. 61
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 1990No. A044217California2,188 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stein, J.

*636 Opinion

Lawyers Surety Corporation (surety) appeals from an order granting the petition of Jeanette Marie Mason to surcharge the guardian of her estate and ordering the surety to make payment on the bond. On appeal, the surety contends that the court erred in applying the specific statute of limitation set forth in Probate Code section 2333, instead of Code of Civil Procedure section 337.

*

We hold that Probate Code section 2333 is the applicable statute of limitations.

*

Facts

On June 18, 1981, John K. Spencer, Jr. (guardian), was appointed as a successor guardian of the ward, Jeanette Marie Mason. On May 5, 1982, Mason attained the age of majority. On September 2, 1982, the guardian filed a petition for settlement of the first and final account.

On September 30, 1982, the probate court settled the account and ordered the guardian to distribute to Mason the guardianship property total-ling $78,310.07. The guardianship estate consisted of the following: (1) $19,810.07 in cash, (2) a promissory note for $50,000 due May 11, 1983, and (3) certain real property in Mendocino County valued at $8,500. The order further provided that the guardian would be discharged on May 5,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.