Edwards

Edwards v. Superior Court

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 480·230 Cal. App. 3d 173·281 Cal. Rptr. 30·91 Daily Journal DAR 5743·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3595
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 1991No. B053962California1,987 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

George, J.

In this habeas corpus proceeding, Roland Edwards, Pat Edwards, Linda Martin, Terry Martin, and Shavin Kingsmere *175 Kennels (collectively referred to as petitioners) challenge the order of the superior court finding them in contempt for their failure to comply with a writ of possession directing them to transfer possession of a championship show dog to Dr. Patricia Walters. Petitioners contend they were relieved of the obligation to deliver possession of the dog because they filed a “counterbond” pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 515.020. 1 For the reasons that follow, we direct the superior court to vacate its order holding petitioners in contempt.

Procedural and Factual History

On April 5, 1990, Dr. Patricia Walters filed a complaint against petitioners, alleging a cause of action “for possession of personal property and for damages.” 2 The complaint alleged as follows.

On September 10, 1988, Walters purchased from petitioners for $600 a female English Bull Terrier named Shavin Kingsmere Notty Nada (whom we take the liberty hereinafter of referring to as Nada). 3 The parties orally agreed that petitioners would exhibit Nada in dog shows which the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.