Rao
Rao v. Campo
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Danielson, J.
*977 Opinion
Zafar A. Rao (plaintiff) purports to appeal:
From orders made July 27,1990, (1) granting the motion of Darius Campo (defendant) for a protective order with regard to about 200 interrogatories propounded by plaintiff, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 2030, subdivision (e); and (2) imposing monetary sanctions in the sum of $780.50 against plaintiff pursuant to sections 2030, 2 subdivision (e) and 2023, subdivision (b)(1); and
From orders made August 24, 1990, (3) denying plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the July 27 orders (§ 1008); (4) imposing monetary sanctions against plaintiff, payable to defendant’s counsel in the sum of $735, because of bad faith and frivolous tactics, under section 128.5, 3 and (5) imposing monetary sanctions against plaintiff in the sum of $750, payable to the County of Los Angeles.
We dismiss the purported appeals from the above orders as having been taken from nonappealable orders; however, we point out that those orders are reviewable on appeal from the final judgment in the main action.