Rao

Rao v. Campo

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1050·233 Cal. App. 3d 1557·285 Cal. Rptr. 691·91 Daily Journal DAR 11288·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7415
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 1991No. B053573California3,749 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Danielson, J.

*977 Opinion

Zafar A. Rao (plaintiff) purports to appeal:

From orders made July 27,1990, (1) granting the motion of Darius Campo (defendant) for a protective order with regard to about 200 interrogatories propounded by plaintiff, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 2030, subdivision (e); and (2) imposing monetary sanctions in the sum of $780.50 against plaintiff pursuant to sections 2030, 2 subdivision (e) and 2023, subdivision (b)(1); and

From orders made August 24, 1990, (3) denying plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the July 27 orders (§ 1008); (4) imposing monetary sanctions against plaintiff, payable to defendant’s counsel in the sum of $735, because of bad faith and frivolous tactics, under section 128.5, 3 and (5) imposing monetary sanctions against plaintiff in the sum of $750, payable to the County of Los Angeles.

We dismiss the purported appeals from the above orders as having been taken from nonappealable orders; however, we point out that those orders are reviewable on appeal from the final judgment in the main action.

Discussion

I. Orders Dated July 27, 1990, Granting Protective Order and Imposing Discovery Sanctions in the Sum of $780.

Historically,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.