Freitas

Freitas v. Abernethy

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 527·5 Cal. App. 4th 1193·7 Cal. Rptr. 2d 342·92 Daily Journal DAR 5353·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3462
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 1992No. A055057California2,129 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

King, J.

In this case we hold that the conflict of interest standard enunciated in Penal Code section 1424 applies to a motion to disqualify a district attorney from performing any authorized duty, including participation in civil proceedings for the modification of child support orders.

The County of Napa (County) apeals from an order disqualifying its entire district attorney’s office from representing Cyndi Abernethy (Freitas) in a review of a stipulated child support order, contending the trial court erred by rejecting the conflict of interest standard enunciated in Penal Code section 1424.

Cyndi and James Patrick Abernethy were married on November 25, 1974, and had one child, James Douglas, born May 17, 1976. A petition for *1196 dissolution of the marriage and child support was filed and a default judgment entered against James on April 20, 1983.

On December 3, 1990, the Napa County District Attorney’s Office, Family Support Division, filed an order to show cause re modification. 1 The parties agreed to a stipulation, which the court approved and entered as its judgment and order on January 18, 1991. The court calendared the matter for July 15, 1991, for further review of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.