Smyth

Smyth v. USAA Property & Casualty Insurance

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 578·5 Cal. App. 4th 1470·7 Cal. Rptr. 2d 694·92 Daily Journal DAR 5898·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3755
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 1992No. B057788California2,550 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stone, J.

In this insurance coverage dispute, Theodore H. Smyth (Smyth) appeals from the order of the trial court dismissing his action *1473 against respondents, USAA Property and Casualty Insurance Company and United Services Automobile Association (collectively, USAA), after the court sustained demurrers to his amended complaints without leave to amend. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 581d—written, signed and filed order of dismissal is appealable; 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Appeal, § 75, p. 99.)

Smyth contends that his homeowners insurer, USAA, had a duty to defend him against a suit for damages for personal injuries and deaths suffered in a massive fire in a hotel in San Juan, Puerto Rico (the Fire Suit). Smyth was named in the Fire Suit in his capacity as an outside director of the corporation which owned the hotel.

He asserts the terms of his policies are ambiguous regarding whether his service as a director of the corporation is covered, raising questions of fact which may not be resolved on demurrer.

He also contends that the statutes of limitations do not bar his causes of action for bad faith and negligent misrepresentation, and that USAA is estopped to assert the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.