San Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. Wendell E.

Good Law
6 Cal. App. 4th 1768
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 1992No. H008636California4,480 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bamattremanoukian, J.

Following a combined 12- and 18-month review hearing, the juvenile court issued an order authorizing a *1771 permanency planning hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, thereby terminating reunification services to the minor’s father, Wendell E. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22, subd. (a). 1 ) The father appeals, contending that the order was an abuse of discretion in light of the court’s finding that reasonable reunification services had not been provided to him.

A referral order pursuant to section 366.22 is made nonappealable by section 366.26, subdivision (k), but may be reviewed by extraordinary writ. (§ 366.26, subd. (k); In re Amber U. (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 871, 880 [ 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 726 ].) Because of the circumstances of this case we will treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of mandate.

We conclude that the peremptory writ of mandate must issue and we direct that the court hold further proceedings in order to determine whether to proceed with the section 366.26 selection and implementation hearing, in light of the opinions expressed herein.

Background

Dino E. was born on December 19, 1989. He was taken into protective custody due to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.