Thompson

People v. Thompson

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 2d 15·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 902·7 Cal. App. 4th 1966·92 Daily Journal DAR 9881·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6271
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 1992No. B055659California2,996 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Woodsfred, J.

*1969 Opinion

Convicted by jury of first degree murder (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 187, 189; count I), igniting a destructive device causing death (§ 12310, subd. (a); count III), and igniting a destructive device causing bodily injury (§ 12309; count IV), appellant contends: (1) section 12310, subdivision (a) requires that an aider and abettor have an intent to kill; (2) his confession was improperly admitted; (3) victim photographs should not have been admitted; and (4) the trial court failed to exercise sentencing discretion. We reject all but appellant’s fourth contention, affirm the three convictions but reverse the sentences on counts I and III and remand the matter to the trial court for resentencing.

Procedural and Factual Background

There being no insufficiency of evidence claim, we synopsize the evidence and do so with a perspective favoring the judgment. (People v. Barnes (1986) 42 Cal.3d 284, 303-304 [ 721 P.2d 110 ].)

It was about 11:30 p.m., July 3, 1988, when Lisa Lee and her two-year-old son Dionsa returned home after an evening at grandmother’s house. Lisa gave Dionsa a bath and brought him to his bedroom—the front bedroom, closest to the street. The lights were on and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.