San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Gerald J.

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 2d 813·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1000·8 Cal. App. 4th 1080·92 Daily Journal DAR 11305·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7054
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 13, 1992No. D015384California4,223 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Froehlich, J.

Gerald J. (Father) and Cynthia T. (Mother) appeal from a judgment following a selection and implementation hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code 2 section 366.26, which terminated their parental rights and placed their two children, Jennifer and Richard, for adoption. Both Mother’s and Father’s appeals included efforts to achieve review of certain orders made at prior review hearings. 3 Upon respondent’s motion to limit the scope of appeal, this court determined that the review efforts which were the subject of the motion could not be challenged following the selection and implementation hearing. Following In re Taya C. (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 1 [ 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 810 ] and In re Amanda B. (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 935 [ 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 922 ], we ruled that review of interim orders made at review or reference hearings must be undertaken by timely writ petition and cannot be achieved as part of an appeal from a selection and implementation hearing judgment. We therefore issued an order limiting the scope of appeal.

The contentions which remain for determination are as follows:

While each of these contentions is to some degree fact related, our discussion does not require or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.