Herrera

Herrera v. Farrell Construction Co.

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 4th 630·12 Cal. Rptr. 2d 751·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1239·92 Daily Journal DAR 14369·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8668
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 21, 1992No. A055872California3,604 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Poché, J.

Probate Code section 6540, subdivision (b)(2) provides in pertinent part: “A parent of the decedent who was actually dependent in whole or in part upon the decedent for support . . . may be given such reasonable family allowance out of the estate as the court in its discretion determines is necessary for [his or her] maintenance according to [his or her] circumstances during administration of the estate.” 1 We hold that the probate court did not abuse the discretion granted by this statute when it denied a parent’s application for a family allowance solely in order that a judgment creditor of the estate could be paid.

Background

The decedent, Paul M. Herrera, died intestate in December of 1987 without wife or issue. His mother, Marie Herrera, was appointed administrator of his estate.

Upon petition of an unsatisfied judgment creditor of the estate, and because Mrs. Herrera had failed to submit an accounting as ordered, the probate court suspended her powers as administrator. The court subsequently removed Mrs. Herrera from that position and found her liable for the amount of the creditor’s judgment.

In June of 1991, after this creditor had its claim satisfied,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.