Weiss

Weiss v. Weiss

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 4th 1621·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1114·24 Cal. Rptr. 2d 190·93 Daily Journal DAR 14069·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8276
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 4, 1993No. B075283California5,402 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lillie, J.

Joan Weiss (hereinafter Weiss) appeals from three orders pertaining to the administration of the estate of her deceased aunt, Frances B. Hammer, by Weiss’s estranged husband, Robert Weiss, executor of Frances Hammer’s estate. The two orders specifically challenged by Weiss on appeal are (1) the February 18, 1993, order instructing and authorizing the executor to employ the law firm of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy (Milbank, Tweed) on behalf of the estate, and (2) the March 22, 1993, order denying her petition for removal of Robert Weiss as executor.

*1627 Factual and Procedural Background

Frances Hammer, the wife of Armand Hammer, died on December 16, 1989; her last will, executed in May 1988, was admitted to probate on January 23, 1990; her will named Weiss, her niece, as sole beneficiary; the will named Robert Weiss, Weiss’s husband, as executor, without bond, and named Weiss as executor if Robert Weiss was unwilling or unable to act. Letters testamentary were issued to Robert Weiss in January 1990.

Frances Hammer had been married to Armand Hammer and they lived together in California for over 30 years; at the time of her death, Frances Hammer’s probate estate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.