Hanson

Hanson v. Gram

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 573·25 Cal. App. 4th 859·30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 792·94 Daily Journal DAR 7868·18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1532
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 1994No. D016979California2,865 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Benke, J.

Marilyn J. Gram Hanson appeals from an order characterizing her former husband’s enhanced early retirement benefits as separate property.

*861 Background

Marilyn J. and Allen E. Gram were married on May 28, 1960. Allen started work for the San Diego Union-Tribune Newspapers (Union-Tribune) on October 14, 1968, and began accumulating retirement credit in the Copley Press, Inc., retirement plan on November 1, 1969.

The couple separated on September 15, 1981. On April 19, 1983, the parties entered into a marital termination agreement giving the superior court continuing jurisdiction over the community interest in Allen’s Union-Tribune employment benefits and defining a formula for their division. The formula required the total number of days employed during marriage be divided by the total number of days employed on the date of retirement. This figure was multiplied by the monthly retirement benefit to compute the community share of the payment. Marilyn’s share of the benefit was one-half that amount.

In August 1991, the San Diego Union and San Diego Tribune newspapers announced plans to merge. The merged operation would not employ all workers from the two newspapers. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.