Martinez

People v. Martinez

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 733·26 Cal. App. 4th 1098·31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 869·94 Daily Journal DAR 9879·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5444
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 13, 1994No. B079428California2,421 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Woodsfred, J.

— Juan Carlos Martinez (appellant), Nelson Salvador Castillo, and Jesse James Tarver were charged with a special circumstance murder, robbery, and several attempted robberies. The prosecution’s severance motion was granted and appellant was tried alone.

A jury convicted appellant of first degree murder (Pen. Code, 1 § 187; count I) and found true as special circumstances (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)) personal firearm use (§ 12022.5), and principal armed with a firearm (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1)) allegations. The jury also convicted appellant of robbery (§§ 211, 12022.5, 12022, subd. (a)(1); count III) and four counts of attempted robbery (§§ 664/211, 12022.5, 12022, subd. (a)(1); counts II, IV, V, and VI) but acquitted him of one attempted robbery count (§§ 664/211; count VII).

Appellant contends that as to two charges, the murder and attempted robbery of Charles Roger Doll (counts I and II), and the attempted robbery special circumstance, the prosecution failed to establish a corpus delicti. Appellant also contends the trial court erred in refusing an accessory after the fact instruction (§ 32), a lesser related offense to murder.

*1101 We find no error and affirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.