Wraxall

Williams v. Wraxall

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 239·33 Cal. App. 4th 120·39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 658·95 Daily Journal DAR 3405·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1992
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 1995No. A061964California6,151 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Newsom, J.

Respondent Kenneth Derrell Williams (hereafter Kenneth or respondent) and his brother Frederick Williams (hereafter Fredrick) were separately charged in Placer County Superior Court with the burglary, rape, robbery, kidnapping and murder, with special circumstances, of Heather Meade (hereafter Heather) in June of 1980. Attorneys Douglas Greer and Ronald Castro were appointed to represent respondent; William Lipschultz was appointed as counsel for Frederick. 1 The criminal cases against respondent and his brother Frederick were consolidated in October of 1980, and a joint pretrial motion for change of venue was denied.

The prosecution engaged Michael Saggs (hereafter Saggs), a serologist employed by the department of justice, to undertake a serological examination to determine the blood type, secretor status and phosphoglumotose (PGM) 2 grouping of samples taken from the victim, her panties, two shirts and a bedsheet. The same tests were conducted on respondent, Frederick, the victim’s fiancé, and two of her male friends.

Lipschultz retained appellant Brian Wraxall (hereafter Wraxall) in September of 1980 to independently examine the serological evidence on behalf *126…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.