FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 478·35 Cal. App. 4th 69·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 404·95 Daily Journal DAR 6695·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3929
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 1995No. B088501California3,398 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Turner, J.

Defendants, FSR Brokerage, Inc., doing business as Fred Sands Realtors (Sands), Prichett Realty Corp. (Prichett), and Gary Marquis, seek a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to enter summary judgment on consolidated personal injury and wrongful death complaints of 36 plaintiffs. The consolidated complaints were filed as a result of the collapse of a balcony on an oceanfront residence in Malibu on November 15, 1992. Based on the facts set forth in the parties’ papers, the aforementioned defendants, realtors who were involved in the sale of the oceanfront residence where the tragic collapse occurred, are entitled to summary judgment because they owe no legal duty to any of the injured parties. Further, we conclude the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (h) 1 so as to permit additional use of the discovery process.

The present case involves 29 consolidated actions. The earliest original complaint was filed on December 10, 1992. The last complaint was filed on October 28, 1993. On July 25, 1994, Sands moved for summary judgment. The evidence cited to in its separate statement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.