Los Angeles County Department of Children's Service v. Drake W.

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 755·37 Cal. App. 4th 721·43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 666·95 Daily Journal DAR 10682·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6296
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 8, 1995No. B082593California2,641 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brandlin, J.

*724 Opinion

Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services

(DCS) appeals from an order entered pursuant to section 366.26 of the Welfare and Institutions Code,* 1 determining that although the minors Teneka W. (Teneka) and Drake W., Jr. (Drake Jr.), were adoptable, termination of the parental rights of their father Drake W., Sr. (Drake Sr.), would be detrimental to them. 2 The court subsequently ordered legal guardianship instead of adoption.

In 1992, Drake Sr. brutally killed his wife and the minors’ mother, Josephine. He had also physically abused the minors. He is now serving a 12-year prison term for the homicide. The court-appointed expert testified that the minors would benefit more from an adoptive placement than from continued contacts with the father. Nonetheless, the trial court declined to free the minors for adoption.

Facts and Procedural Events

Three weeks after the homicide, DCS filed a petition on behalf of Amia B. (Amia) (the minors’ eleven-year-old half sister), Teneka (age three), and Drake Jr. (age one and one-half), alleging the minors were persons described by section 300 and thus within the juvenile court’s jurisdiction.

The court sustained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.