San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Rodney D.

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1002·38 Cal. App. 4th 1813·46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 198·95 Daily Journal DAR 13933·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8130
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 1995No. D023165California6,045 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kremer, J.

Rodney D. appeals from orders issued at the dispositional hearing of a dependency proceeding denying him placement of his six children. In this opinion, we conclude the court failed to apply Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 361.2, subdivisions (a) and (b), the proper statutory provision to determine whether the children should have been placed with Rodney. We further decline to imply a finding of detriment required under section 361.2. Finally, we conclude such a finding must be supported by clear and convincing evidence.

Background

Between October 1987 and February 1994, Angela A. (Angela or the mother) and Rodney D. (Rodney or the father) had six children: Marquis, *1817 Olar, Elijah, Dachuray, Connie, and Sonja. 2 Angela and Rodney lived together off and on with the longest period of cohabitation being three months. Although Angela primarily cared for the children, Rodney maintained regular contact and visitation with them. Angela developed a long history of referrals to child protective services for child rearing problems.

On December 1, 1994, six-year-old Olar was discovered by school personnel to have a bum on the back of her left hand the “size of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.