Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ette L.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 61·41 Cal. App. 4th 1557·49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 200·96 Daily Journal DAR 871·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 592
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1996No. B089459California1,811 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aldrich, J.

Introduction

Ette L. appeals from the order terminating parental rights, contending the trial court erred in failing to order “ongoing and frequent” sibling visitation for the minor, Nachelle S., as part of the permanent plan. We hold Ette does not have standing to raise this contention on appeal. Even were she to have standing, we conclude no error was committed. The statute upon which she relies was not in effect at the time the trial court filed the order terminating her rights. The order appealed from is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

Nachelle S. was bom on June 22, 1992. The mother, Ette was incarcerated when she gave birth to Nachelle and has a 15-year history of drug abuse, *1559 mental and emotional problems, and extremely violent behavior. 1 The father’s whereabouts were initially unknown and he has never provided the minor with the necessities of life. 2 Days after her birth, proceedings were instituted under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 3 and Nachelle was placed in the foster home of Mr. and Mrs. S. Nachelle is faring well in her foster placement and Mr. and Mrs. S. indicated a willingness to adopt her.

Nachelle has five siblings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.