San Joaquin County Department of Human Services v. Alzata C.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 127·42 Cal. App. 4th 890·49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 900·96 Daily Journal DAR 1891·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1138
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1996No. C018187California4,619 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Scotland, J.

The juvenile court found that Joseph B. (the minor) came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) and (b), due to physical abuse by his mother, Alzata C. (Alzata), and father. (Further section references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise specified.) The minor was declared a dependent child of the court and was placed with his paternal grandmother.

Section 366.21, subdivisions (e) and (f), and section 366.22, subdivision (a), provide that, at periodic review hearings, the juvenile court “shall order the return of the minor to the physical custody of his or her parent or guardian unless, by a preponderance of the evidence, it finds that return of the child would create a substantial risk of detriment to the physical or emotional well-being of the minor.”

At the 18-month review hearing, the court found that, although returning the minor to his parents would pose no risk of harm to the minor’s physical well-being, it would cause a substantial risk of detriment to his emotional well-being because the minor’s “mental health . . . is at grave risk” if he is *894 returned home. Nevertheless, the court ruled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.