United States v. Paul Y.B. Hahn

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 4667·960 F.2d 903·1992 WL 67202·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6158·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3012
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 199289-10592California4,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tang, J.

Paul Y.B. Hahn was convicted after a jury trial on four counts related to the illegal possession of a firearm and slightly less than a gram of methamphetamine. In similar cases involving this amount of methamphetamine, the United States Sentencing Guidelines prescribe a range of ten to sixteen months’ incarceration. Yet on the drug possession offenses, Hahn was sentenced to prison for ninety-seven months — just over eight years — because of “relevant conduct” which occurred more than five months prior to the conduct for which Hahn was convicted. The issue before us concerns whether conduct extraneous to a conviction is nevertheless relevant in passing sentence. We vacate Hahn’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On March 18, 1989, Honolulu police approached Hahn’s parked car to investigate a discrepancy between the car’s apparently valid registration sticker and a report that the car’s registration had expired. When Hahn opened one of the car’s tinted windows, the police saw a pistol lodged between the car’s seats. Hahn and Lori Mit-sunaga, the car’s other occupant, were then arrested. Two searches of the car resulted in the seizure of approximately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.