Carlsen

Carlsen v. Berry

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 984·50 Cal. App. 4th 212·57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 630·96 Daily Journal DAR 12737·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7737
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1996No. C022288California2,169 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Davis, J.

In the course of responding to Donald Carlsen’s motion to modify their visitation agreement, Lynnette Berry moved to modify Carlsen’s child support obligation. Based on the declarations of the parties, the trial court awarded an increase in child support from $950 to $2,029 per month. Without benefit of a statement of decision, Carlsen appeals. In the *215 published part of the opinion, we agree the trial court improperly credited Berry with a hardship allowance (Fam. Code, §§ 4071-4073; undesignated section references will be to this code), but reject Carlsen’s claim that the court violated section 4057.5 when it considered the income of Berry’s new spouse in determining the tax rate to which Berry’s income would actually be subject. In the unpublished part, we reject his claim the trial court erred in failing to depart from the support guidelines prescribed by section 4055. We shall reverse.

Standard of Review

An order modifying child support is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. (In re Marriage of Kepley (1987) 193 Cal.App.3d 946, 951 [ 238 Cal.Rptr. 691 ].) However, the determination of whether the criteria are present to permit application of a hardship deduction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.