Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Manuel M.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1074·50 Cal. App. 4th 1344·58 Cal. Rptr. 2d 324·96 Daily Journal DAR 13848·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8407
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 1996No. B095879California3,787 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Baron, J.

*1348 Opinion

Appellant Manuel M. appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional order removing his 15-year-old daughter, Nemis M., from parental custody based upon the court’s finding that his 18-year-old son, Manuel, Jr., 1 had sexually molested Nemis and that he and her mother had failed to adequately protect Nemis from such abuse within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (d). 2 Appellant contends that hearsay statements made by Nemis, who was found incompetent to testify at the hearing, should have been excluded and without such statements, there is no evidence supporting the court’s findings. He also contends the court erred by wrongfully entering a default against him. We conclude prejudicial error occurred in the proceedings and reverse.

Factual and Procedural History

On June 22, 1995, a petition was filed in the juvenile court alleging in count I that “on more than one occasion, [minor Nemis M.’s] brother, Manuel Jr., sexually abused minor, including but not limited to sexual intercourse. Further, minor’s parents have failed to take action to protect minor.”

Nemis is developmentally delayed. She is described by social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.