San Joaquin County Department of Human Services v. Edward S.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1125·51 Cal. App. 4th 393·58 Cal. Rptr. 2d 494·96 Daily Journal DAR 14413·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8725
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 1996No. C022795California1,851 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Morrison, J.

Edward S., the father of the minor, appeals from juvenile court orders declaring the minor to be a dependent child of the court and removing her from his custody. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 360, 395; further section references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) The mother is not involved in this appeal. Father contends the allegations sustained at the jurisdiction hearing do not support the finding of jurisdiction. We agree.

On September 7, 1995, at a contested jurisdictional hearing, the parties agreed to amend the petition and submit jurisdiction on the reports. Contrary to a suggestion by the San Joaquin County Department of Human Services (the Department), this was not a concession of jurisdiction. (See In re Tommy E. (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1234 [ 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 402 ].) A typed copy of the *396 amended allegations was filed on October 19, 1995. This section 300 form petition (Judicial Council of Cal. form JV-121, eff. July 1, 1991) alleges the following.

The minor was born in February 1992, was detained in June 1995, and was now placed in a “Satellite Home." The form page for “failure to protect” under section 300, subdivision (b) was used. The form allegations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.