L.A. Cty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Melissa W.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 288·54 Cal. App. 4th 190·62 Cal. Rptr. 2d 531·97 Daily Journal DAR 4852·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2752
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 1997No. B103798California2,281 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vogelmiriam, J.

In this dependency case, the question is whether the noncustodial parent is entitled to an evidentiary hearing before the juvenile court decides custody and visitation issues ancillary to the termination of jurisdiction and the transfer of the case to the family law court. We hold that, when requested, an evidentiary hearing must be held.

Facts

Melissa W. and Martin W. were husband and wife when their son Michael was born in April 1988, but they later separated and became embroiled in a custody dispute. In August 1993, the Department of Children and Family Services took five-year-old Michael into protective custody, and an amended *193 petition charging Melissa with physical abuse was ultimately sustained. Michael was placed with Martin, with monitored visits for Melissa which were changed to unmonitored, alternate weekend visits beginning in September 1994. 1 In March 1995, the juvenile court was prepared to terminate jurisdiction and award joint legal custody to Martin and Melissa, with sole physical custody to Martin and reasonable visits for Melissa, but backtracked when the parents were unable to agree on a summer schedule, at which point a supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.