Sonoma Cty. Human Servs. Dep't v. Evita H.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 373·54 Cal. App. 4th 1387·63 Cal. Rptr. 2d 671·97 Daily Journal DAR 6133·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3624
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 1997No. A074137California5,535 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haerle, J.

I. Introduction

This is an appeal from a March 29, 1996, order of the juvenile court granting Roger H. of Arkansas de facto parent status as to the fifteen-year-old minor who was one of the three juvenile subjects of the proceeding below. It is also a purported appeal from a portion of an April 8, 1996, order of the same court permitting the minor to go to Arkansas “for a ninety-day trial home visit” with Roger H. We affirm the former order and dismiss the purported appeal from the latter.

*1390 II. Factual and Procedural Background

In early 1995 appellant Evita H. (sometimes hereafter the mother) and her three children were living in Lake County. On April 18 of that year, the three minors were taken into protective custody by the Clear Lake Police Department. Three days later, petitions were filed on behalf of each child under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b). The petitions alleged that the children had suffered or would suffer serious physical harm as a result of the failure of appellant to provide adequate food, clothing, shelter or medical care and by her inability to provide regular care due to, among other things, substance abuse.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.