L.A. Cty. Dep't of Children & Fam. Servs. v. Inez M.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 912·58 Cal. App. 4th 1538·68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 666·97 Daily Journal DAR 13812·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8561
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 8, 1997No. B111472California1,550 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nott, J.

Appellant Inez M. appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights on the ground that the order results in the severance of her child’s relationship with a foster family. We hold that she has no standing to raise that issue. Our decision extends the recent line of cases holding that a parent does not have standing to challenge the termination of parental rights based on the minor’s relationship with siblings or grandparents.

Contention

Appellant contends that “literal application of [Welfare and Institutions Code] section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(D)—under the circumstances of this case—defeated the paramount purpose of protecting the minor’s best interests, (parens patriae) violating his fundamental constitutional right to continue to be a part of the only family he has known.”

Facts and Procedural Background

On December 6, 1994, the department of children and family services filed a petition in the Los Angeles County Juvenile Dependency Court alleging that the minor, Devin M., was bom with a positive toxicology screen for cocaine. Among other things, the petition alleged that the minor’s mother was a frequent user of cocaine, which rendered her incapable of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.