Myresheia

Myresheia v. Superior Court

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 137·61 Cal. App. 4th 734·72 Cal. Rptr. 2d 65·98 Daily Journal DAR 1704·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1227
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1998No. B116195California2,794 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jackson, J.

Introduction

Myresheia W. filed this mandate petition challenging the respondent court’s order in juvenile delinquency proceedings denying her a right to a jury trial. Petitioner was charged with one count of the crime of second degree robbery, in violation of Penal Code section 211. 1 Petitioner alleges that with the passage of the “Three Strikes” legislation, she should be entitled to a jury trial because of the consequences delinquency adjudications pose for serious juvenile offenders. We disagree and deny the writ.

Discussion

Juveniles have traditionally not been entitled to jury trials. We review the chronological development of the law in this regard. In the habeas corpus proceeding of In re Daedler (1924) 194 Cal. 320 [ 228 P. 467 ], the California Supreme Court denied habeas corpus relief, holding that the minor had no right to a jury trial. Article I, section 16 of the California Constitution provides for jury trials, but it has not been applied to juveniles. 2 The Daedler court emphasized that because juvenile proceedings are not penal in nature, juveniles do not have the same rights that adults have in criminal proceedings. (194 Cal. at pp. 323-331.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.