Bento

People v. Bento

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 583·65 Cal. App. 4th 179·76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 412·98 Daily Journal DAR 7224·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5166
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 1998No. B108078California6,105 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vogel, J.

Relevant Procedural Background

On September 9, 1996, an amended information was filed against appellants Anthony Temell Johnson and Richard Allen Bento. Count 1 charged appellants with first degree murder. (Pen. Code, § 187.) Count 2 charged appellants with attempted willful, deliberate, and premeditated murder. (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 187.) Counts 1 and 2 also alleged that both appellants were armed with a firearm. (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (a)(1).) Count 3 charged Bento with robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), and counts 4 and 5 charged Bento with assault with a firearm (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(2)). Counts 3 through 5 also alleged that Bento personally used a firearm. (Pen. Code, §§ 1203.06, subd. (a)(1), 12022.5, subd. (a).) Finally, the information alleged that Johnson had suffered a prior felony conviction. (Pen. Code, § 667, subd. (a)(1).) Appellants pleaded not guilty and denied the special allegations.

Trial by jury commenced on September 12, 1996. On September 30, 1996, the jury found Johnson guilty on counts 1 and 2, and found true the *183 allegations that he was armed pertaining to these counts. The jury was deadlocked with respect to counts 1 and 2 against Bento,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.