Usher

Usher v. County of Monterey

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 593·65 Cal. App. 4th 210·76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 274·98 Daily Journal DAR 7260·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5188
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 1998No. H016694California3,859 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bamattremanoukian, J.

The County of Monterey (hereafter the County) appeals from a judgment whereby the trial court granted a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus. The court directed that the County set aside a decision dénying disability retirement benefits to employee David Usher, find instead that Usher was disabled and award him disability retirement benefits retroactive to his last day of service. The County argues that the court erred in finding that it did not proceed in the manner required by law in failing to appoint an administrative law judge to conduct the proceedings, and further argues that even if the court’s interpretation of the law was correct, the court should have remanded the matter to the County for a new hearing before an administrative law judge rather than directing the County to reverse its decision. We agree with this second point. Under Government Code section 21156 (formerly, § 21025), the County was required to appoint an administrative law judge to conduct the proceedings. Because the hearing officer appointed by the County did not have the authority under the relevant statutes to hear the case and render findings, the County was without jurisdiction to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.