Carr

People v. Carr

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 726·66 Cal. App. 4th 109·77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 639·98 Daily Journal DAR 8970·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6507
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 1998Nos. C025717, C027291California2,065 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sims, J.

Here we hold that defendant Buddy Carr was properly convicted of both burglary and receiving property he stole in the burglary. In reaching this conclusion, we disavow contrary holdings of this court in People v. DeRouen (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 86 [ 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 842 ] and People v. Stewart (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 197 [ 229 Cal.Rptr. 445 ],

A jury convicted defendant of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459; undesignated section references are to this code; count 1) and receiving stolen property (§ 496; count 2) and found that he had twelve prior convictions (nine counts of first degree burglary and three counts of attempted first degree burglary, all in 1982 within the meaning of the three strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12)).

After determining that only the nine counts of first degree burglary constituted strikes, the court sentenced defendant to state prison for twenty-five years to life on count 1 and stayed sentence on count 2 pursuant to section 654. Defendant timely appealed.

On its own motion, the court recalled the sentence and commitment and resentenced defendant (§ 1170, subd. (d)). After striking all but one strike prior pursuant to section 1385…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.