Smith v. Golden Eagle Insurance

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 118·69 Cal. App. 4th 1371·82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 300·99 Daily Journal DAR 1494·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1231
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1999No. G018209California1,445 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

This action arises out of the aborted settlement of a personal injury action. Plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to enforce a purported settlement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. (All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.) Thereafter, they proceeded to trial on the underlying claim and lost; they did not appeal. Plaintiffs filed a new action against the nonsettling defendants, defendants’ insurance company and the insurer’s attorneys (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants) for breach of the purported settlement agreement. Defendants successfully moved for summary judgment on the ground of collateral estoppel and res judicata. We agree the second action was barred and affirm.

Facts

Plaintiff Jerry O. Smith sustained personal injuries while working at Don Kott Ford when a driver lost control of his car and crashed it into Smith’s service booth. Smith and his wife (collectively referred to as plaintiffs) sued the premises owners, Don and Margaret Kott (Kotts) and others not parties to this appeal.

After plaintiffs settled with the driver, a settlement conference was conducted on November 15, 1993, in an attempt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.