Caloca

Caloca v. County of San Diego

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 569·72 Cal. App. 4th 1209·85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 660·99 Daily Journal DAR 5868·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4596
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 1999No. D029663California4,789 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haller, J.

*1212 Opinion

The Citizens Law Enforcement Review Board (CLERB) reviewed citizen complaints and issued findings of serious misconduct against Deputy Sheriffs Victor Caloca, Ronald Cuevas, Rick Símica, and William Smith (collectively Deputies). Deputies together with the San Diego County Deputy Sheriffs Association (Sheriffs Association) brought a petition for writ of mandate to compel San Diego County (County) and San Diego County Civil Service Commission (Civil Service Commission) to conduct liberty interest hearings or alternatively an administrative appeal of CLERB’s findings pursuant to the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.). The trial court denied the petition, finding (1) Deputies are not entitled to liberty interest hearings because they had failed to show a present deprivation of liberty interests, and (2) Deputies are not entitled to an administrative appeal because they failed to show punitive action.

Deputies and Sheriffs Association appeal. We determine the trial court properly ruled Deputies are not entitled to liberty interest hearings since Deputies failed to show deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.