Orlina

Orlina v. Superior Court

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 633·73 Cal. App. 4th 258·86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 384·99 Daily Journal DAR 6735·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5303
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1999No. G024200California2,019 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

We are asked to decide what appears to be an issue of first impression in California: May the state retry a defendant on an uncharged lesser related offense following acquittal of the charged offense and a deadlocked jury on the lesser offense? We conclude that, where the defendant has requested the jury be instructed on the lesser offense, the answer is yes.

Facts

Petitioner Mary Suzanne Orlina, a licensed daycare provider, was indicted for violating Penal Code section 273ab (assault on a child under eight years of age resulting in death; all further statutory references are to the Penal Code). At petitioner’s request, the trial court instructed the jury on the lesser offense of involuntary manslaughter. (§ 192, subd. (b).)

The jury acquitted petitioner of the charged offense, but was deadlocked on the uncharged lesser offense. After declaring a mistrial, the court denied petitioner’s motion to preclude prosecution on the lesser offense and set a new trial. Orlina petitioned for a writ of prohibition or mandate and a stay of the trial. We issued an alternative writ and stayed the trial, and now deny the petition.

Discussion

Section 192, Subdivision (b) Is a Lesser…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.