Linsley

Linsley v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 911·75 Cal. App. 4th 762·89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 429·99 Daily Journal DAR 10551·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8294
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 1999No. B121382California3,666 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Turner, J.

*764 Opinion

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, Scott Linsley, appeals from a judgment awarding attorney fees pursuant to Government Code 1 section 12965, subdivision (b) to defendants, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (Fox), John Suciu, and Gloria Dickey, as the prevailing parties on a claim for unlawful discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (§ 12900 et seq.) Plaintiff, who signed a release of all claims in exchange for the payment of money prior to the filing of the present lawsuit, contends the trial court erred because there has never been a determination that his discrimination cause of action was unreasonable, frivolous, or meritless. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

II. Background

Plaintiff filed this action on May 30, 1996, and alleged that he was employed by Fox as a technical support manager on May 12, 1986. Plaintiff worked under the management of Mr. Suciu, an executive management employee. Ms. Dickey held the title of vice-president, corporate personnel. The complaint alleged that when Mr. Suciu began working for Fox in 1994, he instituted a program whereby older, senior, and higher paid workers were terminated in favor of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.