Fenton

Fenton v. Carrell

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 1132·2000 Daily Journal DAR 45·77 Cal. App. 4th 352·91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 574·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 80
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 1999No. B126411California4,723 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Klein, J.

Martha A. Fenton (Fenton), executor of the estate of Sue E. Sedlak (Sedlak), claimant to a portion of the estate of Lorraine Justesen (Justesen), appeals an order denying her petition to determine entitlement to distribution. (Prob. Code, § 11700.)

Justesen’s will left one-half of her estate to Sedlak, subject to the condition that Sedlak was living at the time of distribution. Sedlak died before distribution occurred. The issues presented are whether there was unreasonable delay in administering Justesen’s estate, and if so, the remedy for such delay.

The record reflects there was unreasonable delay by both the personal representative and the probate court, so that Sedlak died before distribution of Justesen’s estate. Unreasonable delay in administration cannot defeat a beneficiary’s interest. Therefore, the order denying Fenton’s petition is reversed with directions to grant Fenton’s petition determining her entitlement to distribution.

Factual and Procedural Background

Justesen died testate on April 24, 1996. On July 17, 1996, Justesen’s last will dated June 12, 1981, and two codicils, dated June 9, 1982, and July 19, 1984, were admitted to probate. Letters…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.