Yergan

Yergan v. Department of Real Estate

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 48·2000 Daily Journal DAR 971·77 Cal. App. 4th 959·92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 189·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 649
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2000No. B119816California4,133 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curry, J.

Appellants Vartanush Yergan and Ardem Vartanian appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of respondent the Department of Real Estate (Department) on their claim for entitlement to payment under the Real Estate Recovery Program (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 10470 et seq.). 1 The Department denied appellant’s claim, and the trial court concurred, on the ground that the underlying judgment obtained against defendant, REM Westfield, Inc. (REM), a licensed real estate corporation, was not based on fraud, but on professional negligence and breach of duty. We affirm.

Background Facts

Appellants Yergan and Vartanian are sisters. Through Yergan’s daughter, they became acquainted with Vartevar “Varto” Mazmanian, a licensed real estate agent and broker. According to stipulated facts, 2 Mazmanian was a licensed real estate salesperson since 1985. In May 1987, he went to work for Dorn-Platz & Co. In 1989, he was terminated from Dom-Platz’s employ and formed his own company, REM, which was a licensed real estate corporation until its license expired in February 1994.

At the time they met Mazmanian, appellants jointly owned an apartment building located on Afton Place in Los Angeles,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.