Robison

Robison v. City of Manteca

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 111·2000 Daily Journal DAR 1911·78 Cal. App. 4th 452·92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 748
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 2000No. C031652California3,131 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Davis, J.

After the superior court sustained a demurrer to his initial pleading, plaintiff Thomas Robison filed an amended petition for a traditional writ of mandate directing defendant City of Manteca to reinstate him to his position as “Refuse Collector Worker II.” This time, the superior court sustained the defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend. We dismissed *455 the plaintiff’s invalid appeal from this order. (Robison v. City of Manteca (Apr. 16, 1998, C027876) [nonpub. opn.].) The plaintiff now properly appeals from the subsequently entered judgment. We shall affirm.

Background

On appeal from a demurrer, we assume the truth of all well-pled factual allegations of the amended complaint, which do not include legal conclusions. (Dills v. Redwoods Associates, Ltd. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 888, 890 [ 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 838 ].)

The plaintiff was a refuse collector in the defendant’s department of public works (DPW) since 1991. After conducting a random drug test in December 1995, the defendant notified the plaintiff he had tested positive for controlled stimulants. He requested a confirmation test and screening of his medications. However, in the interim his employee-organization…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.